Seeing the Forest for the Trees

Photo by Mary Nida Smith

One thing I love about Our Little House being so far out in the coun­try is the quiet.

I can sit in the morn­ing, as I have all this week, on the party deck or on the cov­ered front porch with the Fearsome Four, read­ing the news­pa­per and drink­ing cof­fee with noth­ing but the occa­sional buzz of the hum­ming­birds com­ing for a drink off of the feeder.

However, this sum­mer, there’s been an unnat­ural hum ring­ing through the moun­tains that the dogs have even noticed.

At the top of our moun­tain, a devel­oper is clear cut­ting 100 acres of land so he can sell off the land in lots for homes with a “long lake view” (and these are very long lake views since the lake is 5 miles or more from the top of the mountain).

Needless to say, this has been very dis­tress­ing to us, as well as most of our neigh­bors, who don’t want to see our moun­tain turned into “xxx Landing,” or “xxx Estates” as have some of the tops of other moun­tains in our area.

Our moun­tain area is wooded and clear-cutting the trees causes numer­ous envi­ron­men­tal issues, one of them being the run-off that occurs when the trees are no longer there to pro­tect the soil from slid­ing down the mountain.

In this case, the run-off will even­tu­ally hit the creek behind our house that emp­ties into the lake next to our home.

The result will be a mud­dy­ing of the crys­tal clear cove below our house.

There’s noth­ing we can do about it, of course, short from buy­ing out every poten­tial devel­oper in the county.

Before the reces­sion hit, our county was the fastest grow­ing in Arkansas, attract­ing mainly retirees who wanted to live a lake lifestyle after work­ing for most of their lives.

Several suc­cess­ful devel­op­ments were con­structed around us, but sev­eral were left sit­ting idle.

Dale and I ignored the “No Trespassing” signs on our way into town on Saturday evening, dri­ving the long drive back to where they’re clear cut­ting. If the lots are sold, the peo­ple who build there will have a spec­tac­u­lar view, but the land­scape bears the scars of the beau­ti­ful trees that were downed in the past few weeks and the envi­ron­men­tal impact will last for generations.

On Sunday, on our way to the recy­cling cen­ter at the fire sta­tion, we drove up a long, steep road. The tear­ing and peel­ing sign announced we were enter­ing, “Hilltop Estates,” one of the failed devel­op­ments that was clear cut sev­eral years ago for buy­ers who never came.

Even the roads through the “devel­op­ment” are grown up with weeds and tall grasses now, but the trees, of course, are still gone.

While one planned devel­op­ment sits vacant, save for one home, another devel­oper with dol­lar signs in his eyes clear cuts another moun­tain­top less than 3 miles away.

What a waste.

What waste do you see hap­pen­ing around your home?

I hope all of you have a won­der­ful and safe Fourth of July week­end. Please send me some tips on small house liv­ing, as I will start post­ing those tips on Mondays!

30 Responses to “Seeing the Forest for the Trees”

  1. Vida says:

    Hi Kerri,

    We bought our dream plot in Greece four years ago after much search­ing. It was mainly beau­ti­ful because it bor­dered an area of nat­ural Mediterranean scrub with a tiny foot path and a beau­ti­ful pri­vate bay with emer­ald waters below. Then a project to lay water pipes was pushed through and sud­denly our path became a hideous swath of bull­dozed dirt, with uprooted trees strewn trag­i­cally on the side. The water com­pany (also the gov­ern­ment) then decided that it needed access to the mains water valves along this new dirt hor­ror and cut another road right next to our prop­erty through pro­tected forested areas. Our "pri­vate" bay became sud­denly acces­si­ble to all and rumors of a coastal road floated by, car­ried by an ill wind…

    We sold the plot at the begin­ning of this year as our dream plot had turned into a night­mare. Luckily some­one else found it dreamy in its present state!

    The pipes carry much needed water to dis­tant vil­lages, so this has not been a wasted project, but the wan­ton destruc­tion of an already frag­ile envi­ron­ment and a fla­grant dis­re­gard for prop­erty rights is what makes me stew about the entire incident.

  2. Meredith says:

    When we bought our place it was near a large area of unde­vel­oped land. There were few cars and it was very nice. Then, one day, we went on vaca­tion. We came back to a lone traf­fic light at one of the soon-to-be larger inter­sec­tions. We knew the days of the open farm fields would slowly be over. We are for­tu­nate to live in a very pretty com­mu­nity, but I still long for those wide open farms.

  3. MarthaAndMe says:

    This is heart­break­ing. There are lots of devel­op­ments going up in my town — some on land my grand­fa­ther and his broth­ers used to own.

    • That would be worse, watch­ing land that was once in your fam­ily, go to devel­op­ment. :( When we lived in the city, it was hard enough watch­ing each owner of my parent's home remodel and change it. These lat­est folks seem to have respect for the his­tory of the home and I'm glad to see that.

  4. Ugh! I'm sorry to hear about the development.

    The worst exam­ple near here actu­ally hap­pened down in town, where a devel­oper con­vinced the city to let him oust all the mobile homes in one area, pop­u­lated by trees 100+ years old. He "promised" to save the trees as part of his efforts, but voila … sud­denly the trees were gone.

    Then, the econ­omy tanked, and the whole area is bar­ren, weedy, and closed off with tem­po­rary fenc­ing. It's been that way for YEARS now.

    So, not only did a bunch of peo­ple lose what lit­tle afford­able hous­ing there is in the town proper, but the whole com­mu­nity lost those trees, AND the area cleared looks like crap.

    It makes me mad every time I drive by.

  5. caireen says:

    we just had a busi­ness at the back of us extend their already big enough carpark… not a mas­sive deal I sup­pose, but it is sad to see the earth all torn up for more tar­mac, the black­birds that live in the hedge were check­ing out the earth­works for worms — not real­is­ing their home was being tarmac'ed. Until the wilder­ness, kept as it is, is actu­ally seen as being WORTH some­thing not just to our souls, but peo­ples pock­ets, maybe this will just go on? I hope not. enjoyed find­ing your web­site from tiny­house blog xx

  6. Mo says:

    I think Brian hit it right on. We only have our­selves to blame as we are the ones that keep elect­ing the folks in office and we are the ones that cause the demand that make such ven­tures (includ­ing oil drilling) profitable.

    Not sure about your state but here if ANY log­ging, road build­ing or site clear­ing causes ANY ero­sion, silti­fi­ca­tion or even remove the shade that raises the tem­per­a­ture of a creek there are expen­sive con­se­quences that include shut­ting down the project. If you notice any silt in the streams doc­u­ment report it to ever Wildlife and Natural resource Dept you can think of. We have salmon in our streams so ripar­ian areas require buffers and are pro­tected by law.

    I man­age a lit­tle over 25 acres of Forest land with Habitat being the pri­mary mis­sion. There are sev­eral lay­ers of bureau­cracy, every­thing from the tax man to fisheries…

  7. Alexandra says:

    This always makes me sad. How short-sighted! Here, on Cape Cod, they even take down houses, newly built houses, because peo­ple like the view on a lot but want all new. I hate clear-cutting of woods!

    • I hate it too, Alexandra. When we built Our Little House, we left as many tress as we could. Who cares if we can't see the lake 500 yards from the house? If we want to see the lake, we'll take out the boat.

  8. Frugal Kiwi says:

    I've seen this again and again in the Smoky Mountains where my folks live. The trees come down, the back hoes come out and the land looks like it is bleed­ing. Hard to look at and even more tragic when the destruc­tion is done and then the devel­op­ment falls through.

  9. Debby S says:

    It was sad to read about the down­ing of trees, Kerri– in a way, this is a micro­cosm of the spill in the Gulf– Corporate greed always seems to pre­vail over what is truly best– (No scru­ples, no care, no shame)- When you elo­quently pointed out the con­trast of one vacant moun­tain top devel­op­ment raped of trees and sit­ting empty (sans one home) now over­grown with weeds while you hear the con­stant 'buzzing' of more trees being destroyed, it's hard not to feel out­rage–
    I hope, some­how, you'll be able to work on your local gov­ern­ment, envi­ron­men­tal­ist agen­cies and any­one else you can think of to stop the deforestation…(but don't count on it– The devel­op­ers seem to have incred­i­bly deep pock­ets from investors who see 'green' only as dollars…

    As for what is going on where we live? It's dis­gust­ing. Antioch is being widened– I can't even imag­ine the num­ber of trees that have been destroyed, or the pretty 'veg­e­ta­tion' that lined both sides of the street and the wide side­walks (wide enough for pass­ing other dog walk­ers) Now it will be avoided– with three lanes of traf­fic in each direc­tion, and very lit­tle (if any) room for a side­walk, it will be a place to avoid walk­ing in order to avoid inhal­ing car fumes…
    (It was a deci­sion reached by OP city hall– based on traf­fic — no one asked any of the home­own­ers in this quad­rant– and the truth is, traf­fic only backs up ONCE a day– dur­ing the 5:00 rush hour…)

    Wow, I did NOT mean to ram­ble on so much! My apolo­gies! (I think this just hit me at a time where life seems sur­rounded by 'all things beau­ti­ful' being destroyed…)

    On to hap­pier thoughts– Wishing you a safe and happy July 4th!

  10. Missy says:

    Being in Arkansas last week­end, I always enjoy vis­it­ing the "nat­ural state." I feel peace when I see all the beau­ti­ful nature that God has pro­vided us.

  11. Kerri, clear­ing cutting,control burns and devel­op­ers do not sit beauty in my book.I think all three needs the pub­lic to keep a more watch­ful eye on them. I com­plained to the Army Corp of Engineers that they were destroy­ing what they were hired to pro­tect. The camp­grounds along the lake above our local marina where they were cut­ting down too many trees and burn­ing leaves before tourist arrived. They destroyed all the wild­flow­ers and flow­er­ing bushes. They caused the soil to run into the lake. There has been no burn­ing the past three years. The Fall leaves are hold­ing the soil while they build more rich soil and I am enjoy­ing a few wildflowers.

    • That's won­der­ful, Mary, that you took a stand. We should learn a les­son from you. I do not under­stand why the Corps here does not have more say in what hap­pens to the moun­tains sur­round­ing the lake. At this point, it is local gov­ern­ment we have to fight.

  12. Brian says:

    The real blame lies not with the devel­oper, who gen­er­ally has no inter­est in the com­mu­nity, but the local and state gov­er­nance, mean­ing the cit­izins. If those liv­ing there do not attempt to stand up to the rub­ber stamp­ing of these devel­op­ments we can­not com­plain. One rea­son real estate in California, espe­cially the Bay Area, is so expen­sive is lim­ited devel­ope­ment. Believe me, far more house could be built there if not for the green spaces. Thank God for those green spaces!

    • You're right, of course, Brian. We all must stay involved in our gov­ern­ment and their doings, be it local, state or fed­eral. We can't have a people's gov­ern­ment if the peo­ple don't par­tic­i­pate. The prob­lem here is that we don't have any reg­u­la­tions in unin­cor­po­rated areas. Obviously, we need some.

  13. V Schoenwald says:

    That is the way it is here where I live. The south end of the city is build­ing because it is right on the I-80 cor­ri­dor. My side of town, the north side or as it is known by the locals "the poor side of town", is run-down, and lit­er­ally falling apart. It at one time, was thriv­ing and busy.
    We have his­toric build­ing here, and they sit idle, while they build big boxes, and make it look like a small Omaha, which it will never be.

  14. Susan says:

    It really is a shame the way these devel­op­ers destroy the envi­ro­ment. We have sev­eral failed devel­ope­ments here in the city. Some not to far from our house. The other thing that both­ers me, are busi­nesses that close or move to a big­ger store and then these build­ings sit idle for years, if not decades. We have had Walmart, Albertson (they got run out of town by HEB) Academy, malls that sit empty now. Such a waste.

    • You're right, Susan. I never saw the sense in build­ing a new mall when the one down the street sits vacant. Just update it, for heaven's sake! When are Americans going to stop this waste­ful build­ing and plow­ing through our nat­ural resources? I read with a lit­tle amuse­ment the other day our nos­tal­gia col­umn in the local paper. The own­ers of a new strip mall back in 1985 had been suc­cess­ful in get­ting a cur­few ordi­nance passed to keep kids from gath­er­ing in their park­ing lot after hours. Today, as the whole mall sits vacant, I bet they wish some­one would gather there. Yet, as that mall sits totally empty and unused, they con­tinue to develop on the other end of town, keep­ing the sprawl going.